I just posted this in a bunch of threads on the Intel Software Network Graphics forum, in response to a lot of heated discussion that’s been going on there. There’s also the video I did with Intel’s Chuck DeSylva, explaining why there are not and will not be any WDDM drivers for Intel 915 integrated graphics to run all the fancy “Premium” UI features (eye candy like 3D tab flipping and Aero Glass) in Windows Vista.
I’d really like to put this to rest soon…
Here’s what I wrote:
OK, guys, here’s the deal.
There’s “Vista Ready” and “Vista Premium Capable”. Microsoft decides which is which:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/capable.mspx
The 915 graphics chip is “Vista Ready”. It runs Vista just fine. It is NOT “Vista Premium Capable”. From the above Microsoft site:
Some Windows Vista Capable PCs have been designated Premium Ready. These PCs will provide an even better Windows Vista experience, including the Windows Aero user experience. Features available in specific premium editions of Windows Vista, such as the ability to watch and record live TV, may require additional hardware.
Confusing? Yes. Deceptive? Well, some people think so, and have brought a lawsuit against Microsoft for this exact issue:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2007/04/04/microsoft-accused-of-deceptive-marketing-bait-and-switch-tactics-over-vista
In fact, since that lawsuit, Microsoft has gone back and made a change to that paragraph I quoted. Read about what it used to say:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2007/04/09/microsoft-redefines-vista-capable
So.
To everyone who bought a laptop with Intel 915 graphics, because it was labelled “Vista Ready”, you were NOT deceived. It IS “Vista Ready”. It runs Vista just fine.
But.
If you somehow thought that “Vista Ready” meant that you could run the cool 3D tab flipper, and the fancy “Aero Glass” high end 3D interface, you were wrong.
I’m sorry you didn’t understand what you were getting when you bought a system with an old, low end, legacy graphics chip. I’m sorry the Microsoft marketing material and logo labels confused you. I really am. I wish none of us had to deal with this.
Is Intel ever going to release a “beta”/unofficial driver for 915 graphics?
I’m not the “official” person to answer this, but I’d say “no”.
Why?
Because it’s an old, low end, “legacy” part. There aren’t any people at Intel dedicated to writing new drivers for this part. Intel laid off 10% of its workforce last year - 10,000 people. Ten thousand. The rest of us that are left are trying to get all the work done. Obviously, we can’t do the same amount of work. Some things have to get dropped. Decisions have to be made about what projects are going to happen, and which ones are going to get cut. Like I said, I’m not the “official” person to say, but my guess is that there just aren’t people sitting around, collecting a paycheck, that could be thrown at writing an unofficial “beta” driver. Wouldn’t it cool if it happened? Of course. Would Intel like to do it if we had the resources? Certainly! But we live in the same reality that you do, and we have to make our budget balance just like you do. We can’t always do everything that we’d like to do.
I hope this serves as a “final word” on this discussion. If you have more questions, please do continue to discuss it here, email me, whatever. But I’m hiding anything or holding anything back - I’ve laid it all out on the line, here, and I hope it helps you guys understand.
And if I could buy everyone a drink to make you feel better, or a brand new “Vista Premium Ready” computer to run the Vista eye-candy, I would. But there’s that whole “reality” thing…