<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are silicon wafers round, instead of rectangular?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/</link>
	<description>I'm a storyteller. I find cool new things, use them to make my life better, and teach others to do the same.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jmartens</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-76066</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmartens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-76066</guid>
		<description>Okay, we are getting closer! The thread/wick example is a good one and makes better sense. I would also love to hear what your BIL has to say....the devil is in the details as the saying goes!

I just like to ask why (like an annoying 3 year old kid). I am never satisfied with the status quo. One day, maybe 100 years from now (if we are still using silicon) we'll find a way to make square waffers efficiently and I'll be happy :)

Thanks for the discussion, it's always good over here on TinyScreenfuls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, we are getting closer! The thread/wick example is a good one and makes better sense. I would also love to hear what your BIL has to say&#8230;.the devil is in the details as the saying goes!</p>
<p>I just like to ask why (like an annoying 3 year old kid). I am never satisfied with the status quo. One day, maybe 100 years from now (if we are still using silicon) we&#8217;ll find a way to make square waffers efficiently and I&#8217;ll be happy <img src='http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for the discussion, it&#8217;s always good over here on TinyScreenfuls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bancroft</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-76065</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Bancroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-76065</guid>
		<description>Jeff, as I understand it, here's how they're made, and why they're round. I could be way off on this.

Imagine you start with an infinitely small thread of silicon. Like the wick of a candle. The process for creating the larger "column" of silicon involves rotating that "thread" while silicon is added to it, sort of like the process of dipping a candle. That shape is naturally round, and the wafers are then cut from that solid "column" of silicon.

You could make the "column" squared, or the wafers square, by cutting off the rounded parts, but why would you want to waste perfectly usable surface area?

My brother in law actually works for one of the companies that supplies Intel with it's silicon wafers. I should call him up and run all this by him, to see if I'm full of crap or not. I hope I'm kind of sort of close! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, as I understand it, here&#8217;s how they&#8217;re made, and why they&#8217;re round. I could be way off on this.</p>
<p>Imagine you start with an infinitely small thread of silicon. Like the wick of a candle. The process for creating the larger &#8220;column&#8221; of silicon involves rotating that &#8220;thread&#8221; while silicon is added to it, sort of like the process of dipping a candle. That shape is naturally round, and the wafers are then cut from that solid &#8220;column&#8221; of silicon.</p>
<p>You could make the &#8220;column&#8221; squared, or the wafers square, by cutting off the rounded parts, but why would you want to waste perfectly usable surface area?</p>
<p>My brother in law actually works for one of the companies that supplies Intel with it&#8217;s silicon wafers. I should call him up and run all this by him, to see if I&#8217;m full of crap or not. I hope I&#8217;m kind of sort of close! <img src='http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmartens</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-76064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmartens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-76064</guid>
		<description>Great question, thanks for posting it to your blog for answers!

However, I think a few commenters have missed the point. Espicially Gerry who says "It’s pretty elementary".

The only thing that is elementary, Garry, is your way of thinking. You and Ben appear to assume that to get a rectangle shape that one would cut a square out of the cirlce that is produced (Ben says: "going with a rectangle would require cutting off more of the crystalline structure"). Now THAT is elementary.

The question that really should be asked is "why is it inefficient to produce a square waffer rather than a circular waffer?"

The only reasons given above are:
1. spinning the waffer (rectangles spin, too)
2. even heating (okay, good point but I am sure a solution could  be found even though @Pete calls it "impossible")

So before we call something elementary, lets try thinking outside of the box.

...and Josh, no disrespect meant to you, the tone comments just frustate me. I admire the fact that instead of trying to answer yourself, you put it out there for your audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question, thanks for posting it to your blog for answers!</p>
<p>However, I think a few commenters have missed the point. Espicially Gerry who says &#8220;It’s pretty elementary&#8221;.</p>
<p>The only thing that is elementary, Garry, is your way of thinking. You and Ben appear to assume that to get a rectangle shape that one would cut a square out of the cirlce that is produced (Ben says: &#8220;going with a rectangle would require cutting off more of the crystalline structure&#8221;). Now THAT is elementary.</p>
<p>The question that really should be asked is &#8220;why is it inefficient to produce a square waffer rather than a circular waffer?&#8221;</p>
<p>The only reasons given above are:<br />
1. spinning the waffer (rectangles spin, too)<br />
2. even heating (okay, good point but I am sure a solution could  be found even though @Pete calls it &#8220;impossible&#8221;)</p>
<p>So before we call something elementary, lets try thinking outside of the box.</p>
<p>&#8230;and Josh, no disrespect meant to you, the tone comments just frustate me. I admire the fact that instead of trying to answer yourself, you put it out there for your audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM e Intel em busca de processadores mais ecológicos :: Fórum PCs</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-49897</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM e Intel em busca de processadores mais ecológicos :: Fórum PCs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-49897</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] últimos anos, lembro que alguém logo perguntou por que os wafers não podiam ser quadrados. Existem várias explicações para esta pergunta, a começar pelo fato de a areia derretida que chamamos de silício ser moldada em [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/dev.wp-plugins.org');"><img src="http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/nfs/c02/h02/mnt/24403/domains/tinyscreenfuls.com/html/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] últimos anos, lembro que alguém logo perguntou por que os wafers não podiam ser quadrados. Existem várias explicações para esta pergunta, a começar pelo fato de a areia derretida que chamamos de silício ser moldada em [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking into Intel's new fab &#171; Scobleizer - Tech Geek Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-28105</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking into Intel's new fab &#171; Scobleizer - Tech Geek Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-28105</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/dev.wp-plugins.org');"><img src="http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/nfs/c02/h02/mnt/24403/domains/tinyscreenfuls.com/html/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] <a href="http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/" rel="nofollow" >http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Zeldes</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-19186</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-19186</guid>
		<description>A key process step that uses the round form of the wafer is photoresist application - this is done by spinning the wafer rapidly and dripping the liquid resist at the center; centrifugal force takes care of spreading it evenly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A key process step that uses the round form of the wafer is photoresist application - this is done by spinning the wafer rapidly and dripping the liquid resist at the center; centrifugal force takes care of spreading it evenly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-19123</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-19123</guid>
		<description>Apart from the already mentioned fact that they are round from the way they are produced, there are also practical problems of making some of the process steps on a square wafer. Even/homogenoues growth of films etc is a major problem as heat is not evenly spread on a wafer (cooler at the edges) and that there might be differences in strain. These problems can partly be dealt with, but using a square wafer would make an even distribution of temperature and stress across the wafer impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from the already mentioned fact that they are round from the way they are produced, there are also practical problems of making some of the process steps on a square wafer. Even/homogenoues growth of films etc is a major problem as heat is not evenly spread on a wafer (cooler at the edges) and that there might be differences in strain. These problems can partly be dealt with, but using a square wafer would make an even distribution of temperature and stress across the wafer impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Dahlgren</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-16825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Dahlgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-16825</guid>
		<description>Actually they aren't completely round. They have a bit cut off on one side so that they can be aligned with the crystals in the proper direction. Look close and you can see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually they aren&#8217;t completely round. They have a bit cut off on one side so that they can be aligned with the crystals in the proper direction. Look close and you can see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Steenbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-16742</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Steenbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-16742</guid>
		<description>Thank you Ben, this was the answer where I was looking for...

And thanks to Josh to post my question on your blog...

&#62;Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Ben, this was the answer where I was looking for&#8230;</p>
<p>And thanks to Josh to post my question on your blog&#8230;</p>
<p>&gt;Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-16721</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 07:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyscreenfuls.com/2006/12/why-are-silicon-wafers-round-instead-of-rectangular/#comment-16721</guid>
		<description>Round wafers, in addition to the process by which they are made, provide the most usable chips per area of wafer cross-section.  Sure you lose some around the edges, but you would lose more with a rectangular or other shape.  It's pretty elementary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round wafers, in addition to the process by which they are made, provide the most usable chips per area of wafer cross-section.  Sure you lose some around the edges, but you would lose more with a rectangular or other shape.  It&#8217;s pretty elementary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.399 seconds -->
